This post was written by Wes over at the old Green Party Watch site and I just moved it here. The text is all his.
The most recent newsletter from the Center for Rural Affairs references two studies on life expectancy, both published in April, 2008.
The first study, from the Congressional Budget Office finds that “those at lower levels of income and educational attainment experiencing declining or stagnant life expectancies.”
The second, A Harvard School of Public Health study – The Reversal of Fortunes: Trends in County Mortality and Cross-County Mortality Disparities in the United States, finds that life expectancy for women is declining or stagnant in 1000 mostly rural counties.
It seems to me that there is in this a great opportunity for Green Party activism, addressing the issue on multiple fronts: is it environmental? is it a question of social / economic justice? is there truly gender bias in medicine? is it a cultural (including in the Green Party) bias toward urban affairs?
I have heard it said by Green Activists that the party don’t need various caucuses, especially the rural caucus. There is a strong reaction against the use of identity politics. I have also heard it said that trying to organize in rural California (nominally Red State Country) is a waste of our resources.
If we don’t focus on providing solutions to the problems that exist, then why should we bother?