<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More National Committee news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/05/more-national-committee-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/05/more-national-committee-news/</link>
	<description>America's #1 Source for Green Party News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/05/more-national-committee-news/comment-page-1/#comment-9022</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1659#comment-9022</guid>
		<description>Just a slight correction.  The Eco Action proposal changes that committees procudures so that there is a process for that committee to fast track time sensitive items.  The SC already has a fast track procedure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a slight correction.  The Eco Action proposal changes that committees procudures so that there is a process for that committee to fast track time sensitive items.  The SC already has a fast track procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly Wilder</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/05/more-national-committee-news/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Wilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1659#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>WTF?!

Well, I know WTF.

Hank Bardel is a long-time, dedicated Green Party member. (I am no longer an enrolled Green, but served on the Green Part of NY State Committee with Hank for many years.)

I know why Jason Nabewaniec voted against Hank. It is because Jason Nabs is part of the clique of folks in the national party who do not want any real work to get done, who do not want to share decisions with other people, committees or states.

Jason is the worst case scenario of someone wanting to be the &quot;big fish in a small pond.&quot; Even if he chokes the pond down to a puddle.

Jason Nabs is very, very untalented. He can hardly string two words together. He does not have a lot of talent, or even personality. His main success has been to be someone &quot;safe&quot; for the founders/clique/and other bullies at national to control. Jason Nabs practically spies on greens in NY, to make sure that no one else can do good things at national. There have been many times when we wondered where the heck national got certain ideas, and then we realized that Jason Nabs was reporting (inaccurately) on us.

B.S. 
B.S. 
B.S. 

I hope Jason is wise enough to change his vote. 

Voting no on Hank Bardell is wrong, stupid, petty, and bullying.

Hoping for an outcry. Not sure that Jason realizes how well-liked Hank is. 

(And, if Hank ever, ever did anything wrong in the Green Party, it was not being tough enough on people like Jason who play shenanigans.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF?!</p>
<p>Well, I know WTF.</p>
<p>Hank Bardel is a long-time, dedicated Green Party member. (I am no longer an enrolled Green, but served on the Green Part of NY State Committee with Hank for many years.)</p>
<p>I know why Jason Nabewaniec voted against Hank. It is because Jason Nabs is part of the clique of folks in the national party who do not want any real work to get done, who do not want to share decisions with other people, committees or states.</p>
<p>Jason is the worst case scenario of someone wanting to be the &#8220;big fish in a small pond.&#8221; Even if he chokes the pond down to a puddle.</p>
<p>Jason Nabs is very, very untalented. He can hardly string two words together. He does not have a lot of talent, or even personality. His main success has been to be someone &#8220;safe&#8221; for the founders/clique/and other bullies at national to control. Jason Nabs practically spies on greens in NY, to make sure that no one else can do good things at national. There have been many times when we wondered where the heck national got certain ideas, and then we realized that Jason Nabs was reporting (inaccurately) on us.</p>
<p>B.S.<br />
B.S.<br />
B.S. </p>
<p>I hope Jason is wise enough to change his vote. </p>
<p>Voting no on Hank Bardell is wrong, stupid, petty, and bullying.</p>
<p>Hoping for an outcry. Not sure that Jason realizes how well-liked Hank is. </p>
<p>(And, if Hank ever, ever did anything wrong in the Green Party, it was not being tough enough on people like Jason who play shenanigans.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

