<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Party of Texas Runs 21</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/</link>
	<description>America's #1 Source for Green Party News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Spring</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9129</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kat,

I&#039;m going to not vote in the March 2nd primary this year so that I can sign the petition and/or attend a GP precinct convention.  It bothers me to not vote, but as long as Texas has this bogus primary screenout policy and the Green Party is working to re-earn ballot status, I am left with no choice.  

This line of text in the article above left me confused  &quot;The number signing or attending precinct conventions..&quot;  I wonder if GP leaders need to use whatever means possible to inform folks of Texas&#039; primary screenout policy so that they can make a decision as to whether to vote in the primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kat,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to not vote in the March 2nd primary this year so that I can sign the petition and/or attend a GP precinct convention.  It bothers me to not vote, but as long as Texas has this bogus primary screenout policy and the Green Party is working to re-earn ballot status, I am left with no choice.  </p>
<p>This line of text in the article above left me confused  &#8220;The number signing or attending precinct conventions..&#8221;  I wonder if GP leaders need to use whatever means possible to inform folks of Texas&#8217; primary screenout policy so that they can make a decision as to whether to vote in the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat swift</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator>kat swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9092</guid>
		<description>Steven: If you vote in the D or R primary, you are inelligible to officially participate in the GP Precinct conventions by state law.  voting in another party&#039;s primary bars you from another party&#039;s convention process.  Therefore your attendance will be as an observer only and not count towards the number needed.

you are also ineligible to sign the petition - the screenout part.

kat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven: If you vote in the D or R primary, you are inelligible to officially participate in the GP Precinct conventions by state law.  voting in another party&#8217;s primary bars you from another party&#8217;s convention process.  Therefore your attendance will be as an observer only and not count towards the number needed.</p>
<p>you are also ineligible to sign the petition &#8211; the screenout part.</p>
<p>kat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9079</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9079</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the GPTX has more running. The more the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the GPTX has more running. The more the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schwab</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9071</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schwab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9071</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lively discussion of this story going on at GreenChange, check it out:

http://network.greenchange.org/news/12559-green-party-of-texas-hopes-for-revival-this-year</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lively discussion of this story going on at GreenChange, check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://network.greenchange.org/news/12559-green-party-of-texas-hopes-for-revival-this-year" rel="nofollow">http://network.greenchange.org/news/12559-green-party-of-texas-hopes-for-revival-this-year</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cavlan RN</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9067</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cavlan RN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9067</guid>
		<description>Since i have no other way to find out, can anyone hee explain to me why the National GP suddenly stopped voting on it&#039;s budget and is not even discussing it?

I had noticed that about 60 odd delegates were for it while 40 odd were agin it in votes.

Then the whole thing disappeared. Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since i have no other way to find out, can anyone hee explain to me why the National GP suddenly stopped voting on it&#8217;s budget and is not even discussing it?</p>
<p>I had noticed that about 60 odd delegates were for it while 40 odd were agin it in votes.</p>
<p>Then the whole thing disappeared. Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Spring</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9059</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9059</guid>
		<description>[In order to obtain a ballot line in the November election, the number of participants at precinct conventions can be supplemented by petition signers requesting Green Party ballot status.]

I know Texas has a &quot;screen out&quot; provision.  However, after reading this piece, I have a question.  

If I choose to vote in the march 2 primary and attend a precinct convention, will I be counted as one of the 44,000 supporters needed to secure ballot status?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[In order to obtain a ballot line in the November election, the number of participants at precinct conventions can be supplemented by petition signers requesting Green Party ballot status.]</p>
<p>I know Texas has a &#8220;screen out&#8221; provision.  However, after reading this piece, I have a question.  </p>
<p>If I choose to vote in the march 2 primary and attend a precinct convention, will I be counted as one of the 44,000 supporters needed to secure ballot status?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schwab</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpartywatch.org/2010/01/18/green-party-of-texas-runs-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9058</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schwab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpartywatch.org/?p=1679#comment-9058</guid>
		<description>The Green Party of Texas got a nice write-up in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram for this:

http://www.star-telegram.com/texas/story/1902738.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Green Party of Texas got a nice write-up in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram for this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/texas/story/1902738.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.star-telegram.com/texas/story/1902738.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

